News trading and extreme slippage
When a central bank surprises the market with an emergency rate hike or a geopolitical event triggers a sudden flight to safety, the forex market experiences something most retail traders never fully grasp until it happens to them: extreme slippage. For the casual or moderately active investor using ForexTrades.net to build real market knowledge, understanding what happens during these moments of explosive volatility is not optional—it is the difference between a calculated trade and a forced loss. While many traders focus on entry signals and stop-loss placement, the mechanics of execution speed and slippage risks reveal a more uncomfortable truth: in high-impact news trading, your broker’s order routing and the liquidity available at that exact millisecond determine your fate more than any chart pattern ever could.
To understand extreme slippage, you must first understand how forex trading actually works under the hood. Forex is not traded on a centralized exchange like stocks. It is a decentralized network of banks, hedge funds, and brokers connected by electronic communication networks. When you place a market order, your broker does not instantly fill it at the price you see on your screen. Instead, your order is sent to liquidity providers—usually large banks—who quote prices based on current supply and demand. During normal market conditions, this process happens in milliseconds, and the price you get is very close to what you expected. But during news events, liquidity evaporates. Banks pull their quotes to avoid being caught on the wrong side of a fast move. Spreads widen from a few pips to fifty or even a hundred pips. Your market order now encounters a canyon where the price you wanted no longer exists. The result is slippage: your order fills at the next available price, which could be significantly worse than your entry trigger.
The most dangerous form of slippage occurs during high-impact news releases like Non-Farm Payrolls, Federal Reserve interest rate decisions, or unexpected geopolitical shocks. In these moments, the market can move fifty or more pips in a single second. Your stop-loss, which you carefully placed to limit your risk, may not protect you. If the price gaps through your stop level, your order executes at the next available price, which could be far worse. This is called stop-loss slippage, and it is a primary reason why many retail traders lose money during volatile news events. They assume their stop-loss will be honored at the exact price they set, but that assumption is false in fast markets. The broker is not obligated to fill your order at your requested price if that price no longer exists. The obligation is to execute at the best available price, but in a liquidity void, “best available” can be devastating.
Experienced traders who engage in news trading mitigate slippage risks in several ways. First, they avoid placing market orders during the seconds immediately before and after a major release. Instead, they use limit orders or pending orders that specify the exact price they are willing to accept. If the market moves past that price without filling, the order simply does not execute. This eliminates slippage on entry but carries the risk of missing the trade entirely. Second, they close any positions with tight stops before a high-impact event. They accept the certainty of a small loss rather than the uncertainty of potential huge slippage. Third, they choose brokers that offer “guaranteed stop-loss” orders, but these come at a cost. The broker charges a premium or widens the spread on that specific order type. For the casual trader, these costs may outweigh the benefit. Fourth, they pay attention to the time of day. Evening news releases from major economies often coincide with low liquidity periods, amplifying slippage. A rate decision released at 2:00 PM New York time might see moderate slippage, but the same release at 6:00 AM Sydney time can see catastrophic gaps.
Another factor that contributes to extreme slippage is the type of trading account you use. Standard market execution accounts route your orders directly to liquidity providers, and during volatile news, you get the true market price. This is honest but can be brutal. Some brokers offer “instant execution” accounts that attempt to fill at your requested price or reject the order. While this seems safer, it can lead to constant requotes during news, meaning you cannot enter the market at all during the most important moves. There is no free lunch. The fastest execution always comes with the highest slippage risk, while safety from slippage comes at the cost of trade rejection or slower fills.
For the moderately active investor on ForexTrades.net, the takeaway is clear: news trading demands a higher level of risk management than standard positional trading. You cannot treat a news trade like a normal trend trade. Slippage is not a bug in the system; it is a feature of how forex mechanics work in extreme conditions. If you insist on trading news events, you must approach them with a plan that accounts for your broker’s execution speed, the time of day, the expected volatility, and the possibility that your stop-loss is a suggestion rather than a guarantee. The best way to lose money fast in forex is to assume that your entry and exit prices are fixed in a market that is anything but.
